Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), chair of the Aviation Subcommittee, and Garret Graves (R-La.) said lawmakers will put together a “title that is focused on new entrants” in the next FAA bill. HAILING TAXIS: And it’s expected that aircraft like eVTOL - essentially electric-powered air taxis - and other aircraft that could change the transportation landscape as well as the movement of goods someday will finally have their big(ger) debut. The hearing includes witnesses from the Commercial Drone Alliance, FAA’s Center of Excellence for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Honeywell Aerospace and the National Business Aviation Association. You’ll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day’s biggest stories.įIRST HEARING OF MANY: Capitol Hill’s first official meeting on next year’s FAA reauthorization bill kicks off on Wednesday, when the Senate Commerce Aviation Subcommittee examines “new entrants” into the airspace, including advanced air mobility and drones. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You can find all of us on Twitter: and you just double-dip that chip?/What?/You double-dipped the chip/So?/That’s like putting your whole mouth in the dip! Look, when you take a chip, just take one dip and END IT!” As always, send tips, pitches, feedback and song lyrics to. IT’S MONDAY: You’re reading Morning Transportation, your Washington policy guide to everything that moves. Republicans begin introducing bills targeting expanded EV subsidies, a likely preview of policy efforts if Congress flips. Ron DeSantis and others from putting migrants on charter flights. The FAA likely can’t do much to stop Florida Gov. Expect new entrants in the airspace to play a major role in conversations around next year’s FAA reauthorization bill that officially kick off this week. With help from Oriana Pawlyk and Tanya Snyder Fighting back, the Ukrainians have depended largely on ground fire.Drones and air taxis will be big part of FAA bill In its invasion Russia has relied mostly on long-range missiles and surface artillery fire to attack Ukrainian targets. So far the war in Ukraine has not depended heavily on air power, on either side. Last week a group of US defence and foreign policy experts released a letter calling for a “limited” Nato-enforced no-fly zone over Ukraine to establish humanitarian corridors in which civilians were protected from aerial bombardment.īut critics said that would not limit the risk of conflict with Russia, as Nato aircraft would still have to be willing to shoot down Russian aircraft. So that’s the reason why we make this painful decision,” Nato secretary general Jens Stoltenberg said on 4 March.Ī day later, Russian president Vladimir Putin confirmed those stakes, saying any country trying to enforce a Ukraine no-fly zone “will be considered by us as participation in an armed conflict by that country.” What about a ‘limited’ no-fly zone? “If we did that, we’ll end up with something that could end in a full-fledged war in Europe, involving many more countries and causing much more human suffering. US and Nato officials say flatly that for a Ukraine no-fly zone to work their own jets would have to be prepared to shoot down any Russian violators – effectively making them direct participants in the war. Zelenskiy urges Nato to impose no-fly zone over Ukraine – video Why not do it? It could allow civilians, who are becoming casualties at a staggering rate, to flee the conflict more safely. What would a no-fly zone achieve in Ukraine?Ī full no-fly zone enforced by Nato would mean that Russia’s superior air power could not be deployed against Ukrainians – but also that the Kyiv would not be able to fly its fighter jets and significantly effective attack drones against the Russians. And in 2011 Nato also enforced a UN-approved one over Libya during that country’s civil war. But they are costly, requiring constant air patrolling and monitoring.įrom 1991 to 2003 the US, France and Britain enforced no-fly zones over Iraq in the wake of the 1991 Gulf War, to protect Shia populations in the south and minority Kurds in the north from air attacks by the Saddam Hussein’s Sunni government.įrom 1993 to 1995 Nato enforced a UN-declared no-fly zone over Bosnia. They have been used in attempts to limit an ongoing conflict on the ground and to protect certain populations. The zones require one or more parties to be willing to enforce them – that is, being ready and able to shoot down any aircraft violating the space.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |